An Overview of Love

The philosophy of love underscores the idea that love has a range of meanings as a result of its impreciseness. However, the view it cannot be understand is considered unsophisticated for researchers who attempt to discover the neurological processes behind it or create conceptual models for it. Philosophers also sought to understand what love is beyond the argument about whether or not it should or could be defined.

On a philosophical level, love is a combination of eros, philia and agape. These different forms manifest themselves in different areas of life and relationships. Eros (usually associated with sexual desire) refers broadly to the intense desire or yearning of one for another. Philia represents fondness of another, while Agape refers to brotherly affection (or that of God primarily).

Agape is the broadest form of love. Philia and eros represent more intimate forms that would describe friendships and the relationship between partners. The philosophy of love certainly goes into much more detail concerning its nature and purpose. However, the main idea is that it can refer to various feelings and associations that underpin our relationships.

Helen Fisher gives her tripartite view of love as being lust, romantic and long-term commitment. Fisher’s concept applies specifically to affection between partners. Lust borrows from the desire specified by eros, except that lust is specifically sexual desire. Romantic love is similar to philia; at the level of mutual liking or attraction between partners.

Long-term commitment is adapted in another conceptual model. Robert Sternberg’s “Triangular Theory of Love” provides a more comprehensive classification of it based on three concepts; passion, intimacy and commitment. The presence of or emphasis on these three elements are used to classify myriad types.

According to Sternberg’s conceptual model, the three factors assessed are not types in themselves. It is their combination that results in types of love instead.

i) Infatuation – This is not considered a type of love in a broad sense, but some people consider it to be love as a result of the “love-addicted” feeling. Infatuation involves a high degree of passion (or eros in the form of yearning) without intimacy or commitment.

ii) Blind – In a primarily sexual relationship, partners may have commitment and passion without intimacy. Acquiring mutual knowledge or deeper understanding of the other is not a priority here.

iii) Empty – This refers to arranged marriages or situations where people feel compelled to stay in a relationship for whatever reason. Empty love has strong commitment but limited intimacy or passion.

iv) Romantic – This represents the type of love commonly associated with the genesis of a relationship. Romantic love lacks commitment, but intimacy and passion are accentuated.

v) Companionate – refers to a high level of intimacy and commitment without passion

vi) True love is passion, commitment and intimacy in perfect equilibrium (or that is somewhat balanced at least).

The classifications derived from the “Triangular Theory of Love” have higher utility than Fisher’s tri-partite classification. Even though the concept was created to classify intimate relationships, it can also be used to classify friendships (especially the ones with benefits). An overview of love should entail a discussion of the types that exist both generally and between partners. Combining the philosophy of love and Sternberg’s model therefore provides an acute insight into the different classifications that exist.

An Overview Of Three Popular Weight Loss Programs

If you havenâ????t heard of Weight Watchers, NutriSystem or the Atkins Diet you must be living in a cave somewhere deep in Afghanistan.   These three staples of the weight loss industry have clinics, products and websites, all with the purpose of helping people lose weight.   The real question is, however, do any of them actually work?  Studies and consumer reviews are mixed as to the efficacy of these programs.   In fact, studies seem to indicate that no program is better than any other, and that programs in themselves may produce their own set of difficulties for people.   Here is a candid overview of these three popular programs. Weight WatchersWeight Watchers has been around for a very long time.   The company first incorporated in 1963.   Based on a group support method of encouragement, Weight Watchers tries to encourage its â????membersâ???? to make lifestyle changes that will help them lose weight.   Exercise and healthy portion size are key aspects of this program. Weight Watchers is also constantly re-inventing its program, moving from calories, to measuring to a point system to track what people eat.   Upon seeing the new point system one friend quipped â????oh, starve by numbers!â????  By attempting to change the way people view food, Weight Watchers hopes to create life long changes that will lead to losing weight and keeping it off.   Counselors encourage meeting attendance and public confession, which can be very uncomfortable for private people. Perhaps the best thing about Weight Watchers is that you eat normal food.   You donâ????t have to buy prepackaged meals, eat strange things or avoid any food in particular.   The whole idea is to teach the individual to eat responsibly.   For those that stick with the program strictly, it can work very well. NutriSystemLike many of the other pre-packaged systems of weight loss, NutriSystem devises an eating plan based upon information the client provides.   As we all know, we are not necessarily as honest as we should be when it comes to eating issues.   You get to pick from a selection of eating plans, and then either customize your menus or have NutriSystem send out a premixed selection.  For ease and convenience there is nothing like having a pantry and freezer full of boxes.   You heat them up and eat; done.   There doesnâ????t appear to be much flexibility in how your calories get planned though.   Even overweight people weigh different amounts, are different heights and eat differently.   This is a one size fits most kind of plan.   There are also complaints that the food is reminiscent of the old high school cafeteria selections, and that customer service is poor or non-existent.   These kind of programs donâ????t require people to make conscious decisions about their eating habits, and that is a big deficit. If you want the ease of not having to think about eating, but still knowing that food is available and preplanned, NutriSystem, and other programs like it may work for you.  High Protein DietsOne of the most recent diet crazes has come from the medical field, more or less.   Dr. Atkins began his work on weight loss in the 1970s, but his ideas didnâ????t catch on until the late 1990s.   This diet plan suggests that eating plenty of protein and fat, and skimping on carbohydrates is the way to lose weight.   This concept is contrary to everything that the medical field had been saying about weight loss, so it was received with great skepticism. Still, high protein diets do seem to work.   The science behind the success seems to be that proteins and fats take much longer to digest, therefore you feel full for a longer period of time.   The down side is that you just donâ????t get enough nutrients and must supplement heavily, and if you are not very conscious about your food choices you will rapidly develop problems with cholesterol. If you are a hard core carnivore, this is the diet for you, as long as you make sure that your carbohydrate intake is high in vegetables to help give you some dietary balance.   The chief complaint is that high protein diets get very boring, very quickly.   Questions about long term effects of eating so much protein are still being analyzed. No matter what weight loss program you choose, reducing what you eat, making good food choices and getting yourself moving are the keys to success.   Pick a program that suits your lifestyle and personality and your odds of success will increase.