<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspaper wedding announcement &#8211; picture of bride only or both bride and groom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 03:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: WhatADay</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>WhatADay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>I have never heard of that. The wedding photo should contain the bride and the groom.. since a wedding consists of TWO people..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never heard of that. The wedding photo should contain the bride and the groom.. since a wedding consists of TWO people..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwistedxKiss</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>TwistedxKiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never heard of that, having only the bride or having wedding announcements being such a big deal.  I don&#039;t know if we&#039;re even going to do one. 

I am a Northerner, though.  It could be a Southern thing for all I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of that, having only the bride or having wedding announcements being such a huge deal.  I don&#8217;t know if we&#8217;re even going to do one. </p>
<p>I am a Northerner, though.  It could be a Southern thing for all I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natasha</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>I may be wrong but it sounds to me that you are what most would label a southern belle. Your wedding, you get to make the decision of whatever makes you happy. Some people now are jumping off cliffs after they vows are said. Who are we as the  public to make an important decision for you like that. Yes, for most part most people still carry out this tradition in most states. Now, are most people generally impressed to see a photo of a future married couple in the paper? My answer would have to be no. Today there are globally so many problems, that when you read the paper those are the things that catch most people attention. With all this said if you feel it is important to you that is all that matter. I hope this helped you. If I wanted something the public view&#039;s of others would not be a major concern of mines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be incorrect but it sounds to me that you are what most would mark a southern belle. Your wedding, you get to make the choice of whatever makes you pleased. Some people now are jumping off cliffs after they vows are said. Who are we as the  public to make an vital choice for you like that. Yes, for most part most people still carry out this tradition in most states. Now, are most people generally impressed to see a photo of a future married couple in the paper? My answer would have to be no. Today there are globally so many problems, that when you read the paper those are the things that catch most people attention. With all this said if you feel it is vital to you that is all that matter. I hope this helped you. If I wanted something the public view&#8217;s of others would not be a major concern of mines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>I always thought the pictures of the bride alone were silly. It is a marriage, and the bride and the groom should be pictured in the announcement. Just ridiculous to have a picture of the bride alone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the pictures of the bride alone were silly. It is a marriage, and the bride and the groom should be pictured in the announcement. Just ridiculous to have a picture of the bride alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Half-Way There!</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>Half-Way There!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>I actually just studied this -
&quot;traditonally&quot; the wedding announcement contained a picture of the bride.  &quot;modernly&quot; there may be a picture of the couple.  

So it seems to be a matter of personal choice. Where you&#039;re from, it could well be the richer people focused on the bride alone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really just studied this -<br />
&#8220;traditonally&#8221; the wedding announcement contained a picture of the bride.  &#8220;modernly&#8221; there may be a picture of the couple.  </p>
<p>So it seems to be a matter of personal choice. Where you&#8217;re from, it could well be the richer people focused on the bride alone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weirdiscomplimentary</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>weirdiscomplimentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>I have never heard of doing a wedding announcement with only the bride. I can&#039;t even imagine someone doing that. I would assume anyone who did this to be self-centered and snobby. 

I guess that might fit in with your trend of these being the wealthier private school girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never heard of doing a wedding announcement with only the bride. I can&#8217;t even imagine someone doing that. I would assume anyone who did this to be self-centered and snobby. </p>
<p>I guess that might fit in with your trend of these being the wealthier private school girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payton</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>Payton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2343</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s HUGE in the South. I don&#039;t get it, though, because I guess I just think that the bride and groom both should be highlighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s HUGE in the South. I don&#8217;t get it, though, because I guess I just reckon that the bride and groom both should be highlighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *Miss_Autumn*</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>*Miss_Autumn*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>The bride isn&#039;t marrying herself. The day is not all about her, and the groom is not there just for scenery, even though many people think it is. Every single wedding announcement, even in the South, that I have seen had both the bride and groom in the accompanying picture. 

Most wedding announcements are not that narcissistic or detailed. Also, not every newspaper has that option. So announcements are common in some areas and not others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bride isn&#8217;t marrying herself. The day is not all about her, and the groom is not there just for scenery, even though many people reckon it is. Every single wedding announcement, even in the South, that I have seen had both the bride and groom in the accompanying picture. </p>
<p>Most wedding announcements are not that narcissistic or detailed. Also, not every newspaper has that option. So announcements are common in some areas and not others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AliceL</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>AliceL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>It was once tradition for the bride&#039;s picture only to be in the paper, but today anything goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was once tradition for the bride&#8217;s picture only to be in the paper, but today anything goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apt.209</title>
		<link>http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>apt.209</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachaelwestdesigns.com/weddingquestions/newspaper-wedding-announcement-picture-of-bride-only-or-both-bride-and-groom/#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>Both, you don&#039;t want him to feel left out, and you&#039;re not marrying yourself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both, you don&#8217;t want him to feel left out, and you&#8217;re not marrying yourself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

